I refer to the letter, `Why is Janki so opposed to the ExxonMobil deal?’ under the name of Clement Smith. I should have thought the answers to that question were already abundantly clear.
Having considered the contractual arrangements and relevant law I have said there are credible grounds for challenging the oil arrangement as contrary to the Constitution, national laws and legal principles established by the courts. Troy Thomas (represented by Christopher Ram) and Anil Nandlall have challenged in court the failure to put the US$18m ‘signing bonus’ into the consolidated fund. Ramon Gaskin has challenged the grant of the production licence. (To understand the Gaskin case it is advisable to read the pleadings which are public documents.)